Skip to content

Access adaptations - forgetting fire escapes

Access adaptations ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Access adaptations - forgetting fire escapes

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
Posts: 49
Topic starter
(@rirelandkennetschool-co-uk)
Trusted Member
Joined: 8 years ago
[#901]

I have recently seen several examples of buildings declared to be accessible due to the provision of a ramp to the front door  but where some/many of the fire escape doors do not have level exit /ramps , or if they do they exit onto a narrow gravel path that would be impassable for many wheelchairs / walkers.

While the entry ramp does provide access, if the fire is between the room/area in use by a wheelchair/walker user and the front door then they cannot use the ramp to safely exit. Is that room/space really accessible if it cannot be used as safely by a wheelchair/walker user as an ambulant user?

Check your school or other places you work and update accessibility plans if this needs to be changed.

Add ramps / paths to make the fire exit "accessible" or add internal fire doors to create safe havens where making the fire exit accessible isn't possible in the same way areas above the ground floor are rendered safe to use.


2 Replies
Posts: 16
(@annsullivaneducationgmail-com)
Eminent Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Completely agree, Robin. All fire exits should be accessible to people with a range of mobility needs, including wheelchair users. Schools may need to audit their environment to make sure that they can keep their staff, students and visitors safe in the event of an evacuation.

Schools may be interested in the pdnet Accessibility Toolkit that supports schools to develop good practice in reviewing and improving accessibility. The toolkit includes an Access Audit Tool that guides the user through the whole school, looking at accessibility for their students with a physical disability.

https://pdnet.org.uk/accessibility-toolkit/


Reply
Posts: 1
(@rapidrampsystemsgmail-com)
New Member
Joined: 4 weeks ago

Completely agree. Accessibility should not be judged solely on whether a wheelchair user can enter a building. Safe evacuation is equally important.

Any accessible means of escape should comply with the relevant requirements of Approved Document M (Access to and Use of Buildings) and Approved Document K (Protection from Falling, Collision and Impact), with suitable ramps, gradients, landings and surface finishes. An exit that leads onto a narrow gravel path, uneven surface or other inaccessible route cannot realistically be considered accessible for many wheelchair users or those with mobility impairments.

Where it is not reasonably practicable to provide an accessible escape route, appropriate measures such as protected refuges/safe havens, evacuation procedures and suitable fire compartmentation should be considered. Accessibility should mean that people can use and leave a building safely, not just enter it.

There is some useful information available on accessibility requirements for public buildings which may help those reviewing their premises and accessibility plans: https://www.rapidramp.co.uk/ramp-regulations-to-public-buildings I hope that helps


Reply